|
Comparing the care of AD family members with
childhood development is not a new concept and I am hardly the first to make it.
Those
of us who face this disease generally make these comparisons ourselves,
particularly while we fight the impulse to view our people’s behavior as
childlike. How many times have I heard caregivers, myself included refer to
those mid-stage behaviors as 'having a six foot toddler on our hands'?
There are those who feel the term 'parenting' is demeaning and infantalizes
those with this disease. I feel they are bogged down in semantics and in
danger of joining the Politically Correct Police. I also have to wonder
just how much actual hands-on experience they have had with this disease. No, our people aren't
childish or children, but they are, in a very
real sense, becoming like children again and those of us in the driver's seat
need something tangible to grasp on to if we are to affect the changing roles we
face with this disease.
As
Tom’s wife and my sons’ mother I did many things on their behalf.
-
Evaluated
their abilities and encouraged them to do as much as they could do
within their capabilities.
-
Adapted
our home environment to meet their physical and cognitive needs.
-
Found
and learned to use the tools necessary to their care.
-
Championed
their successes and supported them in their failures and learned
to accept change.
-
Developed
coping mechanisms that enabled me to meet the increasing demands
they imposed on me.
-
Worked
at developing positive attitudes about my role, the absolute
essential ingredient for success.
-
Most
of all, I protected them as best I could from situations that were
dangerous to them and from people who would harm them or hurt
their feelings.
The
similarities are there, one just has to recognize them. However,
while becoming a mother for the first time was also fearful, there was
also an expectation of potential joy and success in the experience.
Becoming Tom’s caregiver did not have that built into the equation.
Where family, friends, and various professionals rallied to help me
develop the confidence I needed to raise my kids, the opposite was
true when I took on the challenge of Tom's care.
The
key to my success in keeping Tom home was in learning to step back and
look at this disease through my husband’s eyes. The more I
understood why behaviors were happening, the more my common sense
kicked in, and much of the fear and uncertainty I experienced was
dissipated by options and action. I realized his behaviors were
largely rooted in how his environment affected his impaired perception
of the world around him. Since I couldn't fix his perceptions, I
could do something about the environment and most of what I did to
navigate those years grew out of the same common sense I used when
raising my children.
-
If
they were in danger of wandering out of the house and on to the
street as toddlers I made sure the doors were locked.
-
When
Tom began to plot escapes from the house I installed dead bolts
and kept the key on me at all times.
We
all have common sense, the problem is that we haven’t been told to
apply the techniques used in raising children to the techniques needed
to help those facing this disease. This may not be the entire answer,
but it is a beginning.
-
Just
as you wouldn’t allow a 5-year-old to use the stove
unsupervised, you can’t allow someone with impaired reasoning
ability to cook unsupervised.
-
Just
as you wouldn’t allow an 8-year-old to drive a car, you can’t
allow someone with impaired reasoning ability and perceptual
distortions drive.
-
Just
as you wouldn’t let an 8-year-old stay unsupervised in the
house, you can’t leave someone with impaired reasoning ability
at home alone.
-
Just
as you wouldn’t allow a 2 year old to go without diapers, you
can’t allow an adult who is unable to toilet themselves soil
themselves unnecessarily.
However,
because our people are adults and not
children we tend to get very hung up on stepping in and taking charge of the
situation because of some convoluted definition of what constitutes their dignity.
We don't bog ourselves down in these hang-ups in dealing with children.
Their dignity is a given and we are just doing our jobs. It really isn't
any different with our elders. It is a shift in attitude and that is all
it is. Unfortunately, instead of taking charge with our elders, the tendency
is to forgo action in favor of avoidance. Common sense
goes out the window and we are left flapping in the wind while our people pee in
the potted plants and go un-bathed. We
don’t think in terms of jeopardizing a child’s dignity by setting
restrictions that are necessary for their safety and the safety of others and we
must not attach the word dignity to someone with impaired reasoning for the same
reason.
Their
dignity has no place in the decision making process because their
dignity isn’t what is at stake.
Their
safety, their comfort, their physical health is what is at stake.
The role we must
take on as symptoms become noticeable is one that is unwelcomed by
all the participants in this drama, but you have no choice in the
matter. Someone must begin the process of taking charge
and that begins with the diagnosis and it begins with your decision to
just do it.
Alzheimer’s Disease is probably the only illness
which can be described as being the opposite of birth.
As
the disease progresses the layers of learning are stripped away in much the same
order as they were laid on from birth. In other words, the person with
Alzheimer’s Disease will lose their abilities in much the same way a child
develops theirs.
According
to Dr. Paul Raia, Director of Patient Care and Family Support in the Eastern
Massachusetts Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association, who lectured at the 1997
Alzheimer’s Disease Education Conference in Chicago:
"At
death, the brain resembles that of a newborn infant."
Dr.
Barry Reisberg has provided the means to compare AD functional loss in the
mid and late stages with the development of children as seen in Figure
III. FUNCTIONAL
STAGES IN NORMAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND
ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE,©
He graphically demonstrates the similarities between the first 12
years of childhood development and what are the last 12 years of life
with someone with Alzheimer's disease.
Dr.
Reisberg adds:
"While
our people don’t go through the crawling stage, or the sucking stage, the
pattern of development in a child during the first 12 years of life and the
pattern of deterioration in an Alzheimer’s person during the mid to late stage
of the disease hold startling similarities."
If
you have the opportunity to watch children develop from infancy you will observe
that their brain is still developing after birth.
No one is born as an independent being and it is years before we can feed
ourselves, toilet ourselves, bathe ourselves, dress ourselves and develop the
motor skills that allow us to become independent adults.
As
a further example: The child's vocabulary begins with a single word,
usually ‘ma,’ which grows into a simple 3 word sentence and then blossoms
into more complex sentences and concepts. They then develop the ability to
reason, learn, remember, relate, and think about all the information that passes
by them. By the time they are 6 you can have a fairly complete
conversation and from that point you witness the rampant development of
curiosity, abstract reasoning and humor. I watched my grandson develop
verbal skills in exactly the same order than Tom lost his. One by one the
layers reversed themselves until he was reduced to one word. In his case,
however, that one word wasn't 'Ma Ma,' it was ‘No.’ Even at that
level of verbal communication his innate need to have control of his life was
apparent.
As
yet another example: Think about the learning process that goes into
teaching a child how to use the bathroom independently. Each child has to
develop levels of eye-hand coordination, gross manual dexterity, thought process
and literally learn and integrate thousands of things before the acts of
toileting and bathing become second nature. And considering that this
process involves being able to dress and undress as well as use the bathroom
facilities properly, it is no overnight event. In fact it is approximately
5 - 6 years of development and constant reinforcement before the child completes
this phase of independence and even then there are few parents who would trust a
6 year old to regulate the hot and cold faucets and take a bath
unsupervised. Nor would we berate them for not being able to do so.
It
is the same learning process for a person with Alzheimer’s Disease, but, it is
happening in reverse. The layering of learning that was carefully built up as
the infant became a toddler and the toddler a child, and the child an adult, is
now being striped away. Rather than insist your family member should still
do these tasks, or feel you have failed because you now have to help them, or
rue the tasks that have now befallen you because you shouldn’t have to do
these things, it is time to accept the fact that they need your help and
encouragement the same way a child needs those things. Going to the
bathroom unassisted will no longer be within your family member’s reality.
They are going to need help and if you are the primary caregiver they are going
to need your help.
In
the most graphic of ways, our people enter Alzheimer's with the same needs
our newborns have entering life.
They respond to love, nurturing, acceptance, touch, body language,
inflection in voices, noise, the same way a small child responds to those
things. A child develops best through encouragement and assurance.
Because our people are moving back through this process does not mean they are
less in need of the same things. If you have ever held and coddled a new
born child you know the gratification you receive from doing that act. You
also believe that that coddling and touching is essential to that child’s
development. In fact we know it is essential. There has been
sufficient research to prove that babies die from lack of nurturing.
Are
our Alzheimer’s people less needy or less deserving? And is it possible
to feel the same sense of contentment towards your aging parent or spouse as you
feel towards your grandchild? The answer is: Of Course! But you have
to expect to feel that and you often have to put aside an entire lifetime of
conditioned response to that person in order to do so. It is
possible to wipe the slate clean and begin anew.
I
repeat:
Their
dignity, their history of who they are, their identity is totally dependent on
how others see them. The fact that they can’t communicate should
have no bearing on that very basic right we all are endowed with as human
beings.
As a consequence, and in a very real sense, your
task as a caregiver is to help your family member regress back into infancy
and through their final journey of life with the same unquestioned awe and
affection we afford the rearing of our children.
How
do caregivers recognize the ramifications of this role?
How
do they face this challenge if the only message they get is: "You can’t
do it," and more important: "You are crazy to try!"
Your
task is a daunting one and it is to afford your family member love and regard
without judgment while you deal with a lifetime of unresolved issues and
navigate a system of providers and services who are, too often, ill informed
about this disease, and a public that devalues them and their needs because of
the loss of cognitive function.
You
will be facing life changing decisions and tasks that not only affect your
family member but which also affect every person involved in your life.
You
will often feel abandoned, isolated, trapped and taken advantage of. But you can
also feel empowered, strengthened, satisfied and loved. And this is as
much a possibility for the home-caregiver as it is for the caregiver who had to
make the nursing home choice. Love and affection don’t stop because the
address has been changed to a facility. In either setting, much of what
you focus on will be the result of your attitudes and your ability to challenge
the attitudes of others.
Caregiving,
like Parenting, is the highest expression of unconditional love that exists.
|